An integrated portfolio for climate transition
Four practices designed to be deployed together — measurement, monetization, transformation and disclosure — with defined deliverables, timelines and outcome ranges.
Carbon Advisory & Net-Zero Strategy
Measure your full carbon footprint and chart a credible, science-aligned path to net-zero.
Most organizations lack a defensible inventory of their emissions and an executable plan to decarbonize without disrupting operations or capital plans.
BED conducts boundary-aligned Scope 1, 2 and 3 assessments, models reduction scenarios across assets and supply chains, and translates targets into a phased decarbonization roadmap your finance and operations teams can act on.
- GHG inventory aligned to ISO 14064 / GHG Protocol
- Scope 1, 2 and 3 baseline and hotspot analysis
- Net-zero target setting (SBTi-aligned)
- Phased decarbonization roadmap with capex/opex
- MACC (marginal abatement cost curve) and KPI dashboard
- Defensible baseline for disclosures and ratings
- Capital-efficient reduction pathway
- Risk-adjusted target alignment with stakeholders
Ranges reflect benchmarked engagement outcomes. Actuals depend on scope, sector and baseline maturity.
How long does a baseline carbon footprint take?
For most industrial organizations, 8–12 weeks. That covers data collection, Scope 1 and 2 calculation, a first-pass Scope 3 screening and an internal review before disclosure.
What data do we need to hand over?
Utility bills, fuel consumption logs, procurement spend by category, refrigerant records and freight/travel data. If the data is scattered, we help you consolidate it — that itself is often the most valuable output of the engagement.
Is this SBTi-compatible?
Yes. Our baseline is built to GHG Protocol and ISO 14064, which is what SBTi and CDP expect. If you want to submit an SBTi commitment or target, we design the target and submission pack in the same engagement.
How is this different from a software-only tool?
Software gives you a number. We deliver a defensible baseline, a prioritized abatement roadmap with capex and opex, and the internal accountability model to actually reduce emissions.
Do you support ongoing monitoring after the baseline?
Yes — most clients continue with a monitoring and disclosure cadence. We hand off a KPI dashboard your operations and finance teams can run, with quarterly or annual assurance-ready refreshes.
Carbon Credit & Climate Finance
Unlock new revenue from your reduction projects through credits, registries and climate capital.
Reduction and avoidance projects often go unmonetized because organizations lack the methodology, registry expertise and finance partnerships needed to convert outcomes into bankable assets.
BED screens projects for credit eligibility, designs methodology-aligned project documentation, supports registration with leading registries, and connects credible projects to climate finance and offtake partners.
- Carbon credit feasibility & eligibility screening
- PDD / monitoring methodology development
- Registry support (Verra, Gold Standard, ICR, others)
- Carbon revenue modeling and scenario analysis
- Climate finance / offtake introductions
- New monetizable revenue stream from existing assets
- Increased project IRR and bankability
- Higher-integrity claims and registry credibility
Ranges reflect benchmarked engagement outcomes. Actuals depend on scope, sector and baseline maturity.
How do we know if a project qualifies for carbon credits?
We run a feasibility screen against Verra, Gold Standard and Article 6.4 methodologies. Within 4–6 weeks you know whether the project is credit-eligible, what the indicative yield is and what documentation is required.
How long does it take from screening to first credit issuance?
Typically 12–24 months. Feasibility and PDD take 3–6 months; validation, monitoring and first issuance depend on the registry and project type. We flag the critical-path items upfront so timelines don't slip.
Who owns the credits — us or BED?
You do. BED is an advisor. We help you structure environmental attribute ownership cleanly in project contracts so there is no ambiguity at issuance or sale.
Do you help sell the credits?
Yes. We connect credible projects to offtake and climate finance partners we work with — but the commercial decision and pricing are always yours.
What if the market moves or methodology rules change?
We design projects to withstand methodology updates and price cycles. This includes conservative baselines, robust MRV, and structuring that keeps optionality between voluntary and Article 6 pathways where possible.
Circular Economy & Waste Valorization
Turn waste streams and resource loops into measurable environmental and economic value.
Linear waste handling caps both environmental performance and margin recovery — yet most organizations cannot identify which streams are economically circular today.
BED maps material and energy flows, evaluates valorization pathways (waste-to-energy, bio-conversion, recovery), and designs implementation programs with measurable diversion, emissions and revenue outcomes.
- Material flow & waste audit
- Valorization pathway evaluation
- Waste-to-energy / bioenergy feasibility
- Diversion program design & KPI framework
- Circular transformation roadmap
- Higher diversion-from-landfill rates
- New revenue from previously discarded streams
- Reduced operational and disposal costs
Ranges reflect benchmarked engagement outcomes. Actuals depend on scope, sector and baseline maturity.
Is circular economy just a rebrand of recycling?
No. Recycling is one downstream lever. Circular economy is about redesigning material and energy flows so waste streams become inputs — either back into your own operations or into a partner's. That's where the economics get interesting.
How quickly can we see financial impact?
For well-scoped streams, we usually identify a payback path within the first 90 days of engagement. Full implementation timelines vary — 6–18 months is typical for infrastructure-heavy pathways like anaerobic digestion.
What kinds of waste are worth valorizing?
Organic waste, process by-products, spent solvents, packaging streams and thermal losses tend to have the highest value. We rank your streams by revenue potential, carbon co-benefit and implementation complexity.
Do we need to invest in new equipment?
Sometimes — and sometimes the fix is contractual, not capital. Many high-value opportunities come from off-take arrangements with neighboring facilities or specialist processors, with no new capex on your side.
How does circular economy connect to our net-zero plan?
Directly. Diversion, valorization and material efficiency all reduce embedded and operational emissions. We build both plans on the same data foundation so they don't contradict each other.
ESG & Sustainability Reporting
Disclosure-ready reporting aligned with BRSR, GRI and global frameworks — built on real data.
Reporting demands now span investors, regulators and customers — and most organizations are scrambling to assemble fragmented data into credible, comparable disclosures.
BED designs an ESG data architecture, builds the right reporting framework for your stakeholders (BRSR, GRI, TCFD, CDP), and embeds environmental KPIs into how the business is run.
- ESG readiness assessment & gap analysis
- Materiality and stakeholder mapping
- Reporting framework (BRSR, GRI, TCFD, CDP)
- Environmental KPI architecture
- Disclosure-ready ESG report
- Faster, more defensible disclosures
- Improved ESG ratings and investor confidence
- Operational accountability through KPI ownership
Ranges reflect benchmarked engagement outcomes. Actuals depend on scope, sector and baseline maturity.
Which reporting framework do we actually need?
It depends on your listing, your investors and your customer base. Most Indian listed entities need BRSR; export-facing companies also need TCFD/IFRS S2 and often CDP. We map obligations to your stakeholder set in the first two weeks.
How is BRSR Core different from BRSR?
BRSR Core is a defined subset of KPIs that requires third-party assurance for the top listed entities. It raises the data-quality bar significantly — you need auditable data lineage, not just narrative disclosure.
Do you produce the report, or do we?
Both. We design the data architecture and KPI framework, coach your data owners, and either drive the report end-to-end or provide review and quality control on your own draft — whichever fits your team's capacity.
How do you handle assurance readiness?
We build every KPI with an evidence trail your assurance provider can follow — source system, calculation logic, sign-off. This is where most first-time reporters fail; we make it non-negotiable from day one.
What about ratings — MSCI, Sustainalytics, CDP?
Once the underlying data is right, rating responses become an output, not a project. We help you script consistent responses across rating agencies from the same source of truth.
Not sure which service fits your stage?
Share your context in a 30-minute discovery call. We'll recommend the sequence — carbon, credits, circularity or disclosure — that unlocks value fastest.